Note for the readers: This is Part II in a two-part series about race. The first part is "Part I: The Misconceptions"
"Part II: The Solutions"
Some say that government is not the instrument of change in society; that for change to truly occur, it must take place in 'the streets'. I would argue, however, that we need both institutional and cultural movements in order to truly make change.
Without the societal movement, there is no ground for addressing the issues institutionally, but when it comes to formal representation of ideas in government, empowerment of the people has to be delivered by those who make the rules. It is part of the balancing act of democracy, and it is the best way to actually solve problems as substantial as racial tension.
Politicians have gotten very good at playing on our fears, but those that dare to inspire us are also those that can lead us to a better life. However, this is not to say that we need blind hope; that certainly is not the case. The greatest hope we have must come with a realistic vision and a pragmatic approach to changing the status quo. The reality stands that no law that could be passed would solve every issue we have with race, but there are things that we can do to raise awareness and sensitivity to the issues concerning the underrepresented and disenfranchised populations of our country.
The problem that we are looking to conquer is not finding out who to blame, but rather it is a challenge of our tolerance and intellect to be called forth to rise above the mistakes and prejudices of our ancestors, no matter who we are. It is our collective burden. And unless we can agree on proper and respectful terms of discussion and work in a multi-partisan fashion, because there aren't just two sides to the race issue, we could no longer hope for a solution. We would all retreat to our self-imposed partitions instead of coming together in an American identity.
Some people may despise this opinion, calling it erroneous or perhaps even irrational. Some may not consider it to be an issue politically or culturally, while others don't want to think about it at all. Still others may think that I am just plain old wrong.
But when a white person wants to talk about race and is labeled odd or insensitive, or if that white person has to feel guilty when expressing their opinions, it's an issue.
Or when a
black pastor takes center stage in a major political debate for saying things that, if the "white equivalent" of what he said in a black church were to come out of a white pastor's mouth in a white church, there would have been little to no media coverage of it. When that happens, it's an issue.
Or when a personal interest in the long history of racism can be
misconstrued as actual feelings due to the volatility of the subject of race in this country, it's an issue.
When a major news outlet can get away with calling a Presidential candidate's wife his
"Baby Mama" or talk about a gesture between husband and wife as the
"terrorist fist bump," it's an issue.
Or when, at a gathering in a Chicago suburb, the N-word is used repeatedly and passively by a doctor and a lawyer, it's an issue.
Or when I hear a group of students at the
university that I love saying that the minority students that attend their school "got in only because of Affirmative Action" and that they "didn't have the grades", it's an issue.
When things like this happen, race proves still to be an issue. It's a secret and yet still venomous assault of which many people may not take notice. While it doesn't occur in overt forms of hatred, such as the Ku Klux Klan or public lynching, as much anymore, it's happening in word choice in simple conversation or in the private attitudes that people express only to their closest of friends.
This is the new kind of racism in America. It isn't that it is "new", but more that it is now being ushered in as fairly mainstream and not being properly addressed. "Silent racism" is an old problem that is now the main force of this attitude.
I don't expect this piece to change lives. I don't expect this piece to change much of anything. However, I guess that my hope is that people will seriously question their own perspectives and examining other cultures of our great country. It doesn't happen from observing alone, but it comes through experiencing what a certain culture is really about. Part of the reason that segregation was so bad was because it committed the un-American error of avoiding a difficult situation by opting for ignorance. Diversity is the greatest gift of democracy, for we do not thrive without the
clashing of ideas.
In our increasingly global society, we cannot progress without addressing our inconsiderate outlooks. We think that progress might be happening, but it is not; our racially insensitive views are only being hidden. It is only when one creates tolerance through understanding that change and acceptance can help to open up the hearts that had been closed by small-mindedness.
It is, in fact, very American to confront conflict head-on, and to establish real relationships with those who differ from us in any myriad of ways. When we confront superficiality, we are grasping our common bond; the
belief that all men, no matter our skin color or ethnic background, should be treated equally in our liberties.
-------------------------------------------------------------
What do you all think about these issues? Do you agree or disagree with Alex's points? What do you think does/doesn't need to be done in America when it comes to race?