IUplanet: Indiana Hoosier forums, sports, photos, and Bloomington life
 
IU Forums | Indiana Hoosier News | Indiana University Sports | IU Baseball Forum | IU Basketball Forum | IU Football Forum | IU Soccer Forum
IU Litte Five | Bloomington Bars | Bloomington Restaurants | Hoosier Hottie | Bloomington Drink Specials | Indiana Basketball Recruiting

Go Back   IUplanet: Indiana Hoosier forums, sports, recruiting, photos, and Indiana University news > Hoosiers Discuss... > General IU Discussion > The Latest on Campus

The Latest on Campus Find out the latest on IU's campus from IUplanet contributors

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-23-2008, 02:56 AM   #1 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Alex Luboff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27
UPDATE: IUSA bloodless coup upsets IUplanet columnist due to lack of blood

Well folks, it happened. Justice has been served to the Kirkwood ticket for their dishonest ways. The IUSA Supreme Court (like Taco Supreme?) decided today, after hours of deliberation, that six substantial violations would disqualify the Kirkwood ticket from the IUSA elections, thus handing the 'seat of power' over to the runner-up and slightly less corrupt Big Red ticket. And if I have anything to say about it, it is "GOOD RIDDANCE".


Corrupt? Amoral? Run for office!

It is about damn time that the axe came down hard on these people who kept building lie upon lie. First it was just some crazy guy sending his former roommates e-mails, then we found out they were going to some others on the ticket, then we find out they were going to the President-Elect. All said and done, the six violations were exactly double the minimum amount of violations needed to disqualify someone from the elections.

It's terrifying to note that you need more than one major violation to get the axe (one is enough, honest!). This means that one count of election fraud and one count of high-end bribery, and YOU ARE STILL IN! How wonderful to know that Chicago politics carry on their tradition down here in Bloomington! (See: Political History of Chicago if you don't know what's up...)

As I've said many times before, it is horrendously ridiculous to think that people who I may have class with (though they probably would have tried to shank me, prison style, by now) have been accused and found guilty of corruption. I am confounded by the idea of this even having to be a worry at this low of a form of government, but I guess that power really does have the ability to corrupt good people.

And here's where I get a little controversial: I hate to keep pointing this out, but while the VAST majority of the Greek community is composed of hard-working and classy students, there are a few bad apples that spoil the bunch, and they infect everyone within that area of our campus. I have many friends in Greek Life, but I have to be honest: did I expect this sort of corruption from an all-Greek ticket? Yes. It is something that makes perfect sense to me, knowing about what the 'bad apples' do.

It makes perfect sense. I never really trusted the message of this ticket, as they talked about "going green" but never talked about how to "go green", for one example. I don't have very high expectations of student leaders from Greek Life because of the reputation of these bad apples. Am I wrong to underestimate those that actually do seem to follow the rule because of their association with Greek Life? Well, since I'm referring to it as an underestimation, you can tell that I actually do feel bad about saying it. But I think it needs to be said nonetheless.

Basically, we need to have a diverse ticket. We need to have a ticket with males and females, heterosexuals and homosexuals, blacks and whites and browns and all ethnicities represented. We need to give extra voice to student groups, and we need to focus on making change on not only campus and student issues (like that basketball student section), but about bigger (and frankly, more important in my narrow view) political issues.

But here's the bottom line: Justice has been served. But what's next? Here's a preview:

1. Should these students have a notation of corruption on their records?

Since a few of these people seeking office actually did dishonest things, should they have a mark of dishonesty (like academic dishonesty) on their record? This may be a little harsh, but it may prevent cheating like this in the future. It's like seeing an older sibling spanked--you don't know what they did wrong, but you do know that you don't want to do it. (Note: I do not endorse child abuse all the time.)

2. Is there any action that needs to be taken to resolve the system errors?

Corruption in the IUSA Election Commission? YOU BET YOUR ASS! Maybe these people should be students appointed by the university/have no affiliation with the tickets that are running/have a general distaste for everyone! If I were to be commisioner (which I can't because then I couldn't criticize the system any as I would be a part OF the system), here are a few points that I would address:

--Voting "Booths" with partisan bias. Some of the tickets set up lap tops and told people to vote. These people happened to be wearing campaign materials for their individual tickets. My idea: keep that stuff 100 feet away from any polling station. Simple, yet unrefined.

--More publicized debates: When political freaks like myself don't even know when the IUSA debates are going on, there is a disturbance in "the force". How about they actually promote this thing? Don't they have like $82,000? Spend a few bucks promoting it. It's not that difficult! We would really appreciate it!

3. Can this be done?

If this current presidential race is teaching us anything, it is that young people are starting to hold onto their future with greater vigor. There is more political activity among the youth than there was even just a year or two ago. As Bob Dylan said "The times, they are a-changin'" and we'll see more of that in the future. Bob Dylan also said "Heemotannapullyaoooooohhhdahweeyydonn" or something like that, no one can understand him. But the former quote is a good thought.

I really want to get other people's feedback, so comment or send me a message!

I remain pessimistically optimistic, if that's even possible.
Alex Luboff is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 08:13 PM   #2 (permalink)
IUplanet Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 970
Haha funny stuff. I'm just glad that Kirkwood is out and the IUSA still has at least a small chance to do some good.
EricB is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 08:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
IUplanet Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 39
Let's see if Big Red can actually make anything positive happen now...
gohoosiers60 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 06:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
IUplanet Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by gohoosiers60 View Post
Let's see if Big Red can actually make anything positive happen now...
i dont think the hall monitors were too big on big red, but they'll have to deal w/ them now. at least that means we have a decent student section to look forward to!
darnellplatter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 03:10 PM   #5 (permalink)
IUplanet Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 52
IDS: Sections of IUSA code ruled 'unconstitutional'

link: Sections of IUSA code ruled unconstitutional

[SWIPE]

After a turbulent IU Student Association election, the IUSA Supreme Court ruled three sections of the IUSA elections code unconstitutional - something the new executives look forward to rewriting.

“We determined that they were in violation of the IUSA constitution,” said Kate FitzGerald, former IUSA Supreme Court chief justice. “Because the constitution is the highest authority, these sections of the elections code have to be modified or stricken.”

The sections in question, 802, 907 and 1104, grant Congress the authority to overrule the Supreme Court and to approve and uphold the Election Commission’s decisions. FitzGerald told the Indiana Daily Student that no decision made by the Supreme Court can be subject to congressional approval or dismissal.

The question of constitutionality came after the IUSA Supreme Court disqualified the Kirkwood ticket from the elections after finding the ticket had committed six violations of the elections code. Former IUSA President W.T. Wright called an emergency congressional meeting for a review of the disqualification decision.

FitzGerald responded, e-mailing Wright as well as IU President Michael McRobbie, Chancellor Ken Gros Louis, other IU administrators and IUSA members, among others. The e-mail said the Supreme Court had received two petitions questioning the constitutionality of three sections in the IUSA Elections Code. She indicated that a congressional vote to uphold or overturn a Supreme Court decision would be unconstitutional. The meeting was eventually canceled.

“It was a weird thing because as soon as it came to light, it was pretty obvious,” FitzGerald said. “It wasn’t like a normal constitutionality case where it takes a lot of deliberation and consideration. It was pretty black and white.”

Senior Megan Robb and former IUSA president Alex Shortle filed petitions with the IUSA Supreme Court arguing the validity of the three sections of the elections code.

According to Robb’s petition, section 802 contradicts section 1001, which states the Supreme Court has the final authority over all properly appealed IUSA election disputes. Robb told the Indiana Daily Student that it seemed like the IUSA Congress was using section 802 to justify holding a meeting to vote on the Supreme Court decision.

Shortle called into question sections 907 and 1104, which state that the Supreme Court’s decisions “aren’t up for the confirmation of Congress.”

IUSA Vice President Dan Sloat said rewriting the elections code will add legitimacy and depth to IUSA.

Treasurer Robin Featherston, who will be in Bloomington throughout the summer, said rewriting the elections code is her first priority. She said the executives want a code that doesn’t have loopholes and will be easier to interpret. She said the current elections code is vague and not as inclusive as it needs to be.

“I think that’s what we want to redo, to pass (it) onto future administrations to make sure they have a fully functioning code that really ensures student rights,” she said.

[/SWIPE]
elton is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 PM.

IUplanet Newsletter: Receive weekly udpates on IU sports, news, and events
Email
Sponsored Links

vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios